The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I suppose illegibility is not a reason for deletion, though this one is a good argument for changing that, and I think it violates
WP:COLOR as well. As for content, this is covered in
List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom (quite well, actually--it's an FA), and we have Template:UKPrimeMinisters, and Category:Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, so this strikes me as an unnecessary quadruplication.
Drmies (
talk)
17:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment. Looks like it really wants to be a graphic timeline rather than a Wikipedia article. Did you ping the original creator,
User:P.hogg, to see if they want to keep a copy in userspace? --
Amble (
talk)
00:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Wow-those were my eyes! Ok-this article is about the most user-unfriendly list/timeline I've seen here. But can someone more knowledgeable chime in and confirm that appalling style is valid deletion grounds? I can't find a provision for such a thing -- just verifiability, reliable sources, encyclopedic (one probably could have found a timeline like this in an old school encyclopedia), and the catch-all of notability.--
69.204.153.39 (
talk)
04:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I suppose illegibility is not a reason for deletion, though this one is a good argument for changing that, and I think it violates
WP:COLOR as well. As for content, this is covered in
List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom (quite well, actually--it's an FA), and we have Template:UKPrimeMinisters, and Category:Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, so this strikes me as an unnecessary quadruplication.
Drmies (
talk)
17:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment. Looks like it really wants to be a graphic timeline rather than a Wikipedia article. Did you ping the original creator,
User:P.hogg, to see if they want to keep a copy in userspace? --
Amble (
talk)
00:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Wow-those were my eyes! Ok-this article is about the most user-unfriendly list/timeline I've seen here. But can someone more knowledgeable chime in and confirm that appalling style is valid deletion grounds? I can't find a provision for such a thing -- just verifiability, reliable sources, encyclopedic (one probably could have found a timeline like this in an old school encyclopedia), and the catch-all of notability.--
69.204.153.39 (
talk)
04:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.