The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Classic failure of
WP:BIO1E. He's alleged to have had an affair with
Ilhan Omar, which is the sole reason he could conceivably be considered notable. It's means this is more of an attack page than legitimate biography. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
21:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Agreeand suggestion. I agree with your statement. Before you nominated this article for deletion,
User:Muboshgu, I inserted a "see also" in Ilhan Omar's article
here. I think this information should be moved to Omar's article if Mynett's article is deleted. But the number of references trimmed to the best major national outlets, as I mentioned at
Talk:Tim_Mynett.–
CaroleHenson (
talk)
21:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
CaroleHenson, it was your edit summary, which I saw on my watchlist, that alerted me to this article existing. I oppose merging this content to Omar's article. It's only an allegation. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
21:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Notability is
not inherited, so people do not qualify to have Wikipedia articles just because they're alleged to have had an extramarital affair with somebody else who does have a Wikipedia article. But this makes no other claim that he's notable for other reasons independently of who he allegedly boinked, and the fact that you can jengastack a giant cluster
reference bomb of nine or ten separate citations onto one sentence, verifying and reverifying and rereverifying that fact while adding nothing new, is not a notability booster. This is a classic
WP:BLP1E.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Classic failure of
WP:BIO1E. He's alleged to have had an affair with
Ilhan Omar, which is the sole reason he could conceivably be considered notable. It's means this is more of an attack page than legitimate biography. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
21:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Agreeand suggestion. I agree with your statement. Before you nominated this article for deletion,
User:Muboshgu, I inserted a "see also" in Ilhan Omar's article
here. I think this information should be moved to Omar's article if Mynett's article is deleted. But the number of references trimmed to the best major national outlets, as I mentioned at
Talk:Tim_Mynett.–
CaroleHenson (
talk)
21:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
CaroleHenson, it was your edit summary, which I saw on my watchlist, that alerted me to this article existing. I oppose merging this content to Omar's article. It's only an allegation. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
21:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Notability is
not inherited, so people do not qualify to have Wikipedia articles just because they're alleged to have had an extramarital affair with somebody else who does have a Wikipedia article. But this makes no other claim that he's notable for other reasons independently of who he allegedly boinked, and the fact that you can jengastack a giant cluster
reference bomb of nine or ten separate citations onto one sentence, verifying and reverifying and rereverifying that fact while adding nothing new, is not a notability booster. This is a classic
WP:BLP1E.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.