The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Notability not established. Outside of press coverage over a domestic dispute, no indication of significant contribution to his field.
Wkharrisjr (
talk) 00:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - Putting the alleged assault incident into its proper context is an editing matter. This is a famous individual, a prominent televangelist, not a BLP-1E situation. See, for example
THIS STORY in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on the Bishop's marriage. Passes GNG.
Carrite (
talk) 04:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete -- I see nothing notable in the article, except that his first wife manages to be WP-notable and that he was engaged in a brawl 5 years ago. Or was he notable as a tele-evangelist? If so, the article needs to be expanded to cover this.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment - "Notable" is not a value assessment about the worth or lack or worth about a subject, it is an indication that a subject has been covered multiple times in independently published sources of presumable accuracy. In short: can the subject be sourced out independently of their own published or unpublished words?
Carrite (
talk) 02:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Notability not established. Outside of press coverage over a domestic dispute, no indication of significant contribution to his field.
Wkharrisjr (
talk) 00:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - Putting the alleged assault incident into its proper context is an editing matter. This is a famous individual, a prominent televangelist, not a BLP-1E situation. See, for example
THIS STORY in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on the Bishop's marriage. Passes GNG.
Carrite (
talk) 04:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete -- I see nothing notable in the article, except that his first wife manages to be WP-notable and that he was engaged in a brawl 5 years ago. Or was he notable as a tele-evangelist? If so, the article needs to be expanded to cover this.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment - "Notable" is not a value assessment about the worth or lack or worth about a subject, it is an indication that a subject has been covered multiple times in independently published sources of presumable accuracy. In short: can the subject be sourced out independently of their own published or unpublished words?
Carrite (
talk) 02:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.