The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. There is enough consensus here to keep. (
non-admin closure)
JMHamo (
talk) 21:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
I am unable to find RS to show he meets the
GNG —
Rodtalk 10:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Assuming good faith with the source cited, he satisfies the relevant subject-specific notability guideline. --
Michig (
talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. I've added a second source, hopefully this should be enough to establish notability. —
GasheadsteveTalk to me 19:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Many information sources from before the 1990s are not yet available on the internet, but that doesn't make them any less reliable. He has over 100 verified appearances in professional football and easily passes
WP:NFOOTY. —
Jkudlicktcs 03:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Obviously meets the appropriate notability standard. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 14:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Passes
NFOOTY, has played in a
fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs.
Fenix down (
talk) 17:41, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. There is enough consensus here to keep. (
non-admin closure)
JMHamo (
talk) 21:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
I am unable to find RS to show he meets the
GNG —
Rodtalk 10:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Assuming good faith with the source cited, he satisfies the relevant subject-specific notability guideline. --
Michig (
talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. I've added a second source, hopefully this should be enough to establish notability. —
GasheadsteveTalk to me 19:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Many information sources from before the 1990s are not yet available on the internet, but that doesn't make them any less reliable. He has over 100 verified appearances in professional football and easily passes
WP:NFOOTY. —
Jkudlicktcs 03:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Obviously meets the appropriate notability standard. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 14:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Passes
NFOOTY, has played in a
fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs.
Fenix down (
talk) 17:41, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.