From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Again, please let's have sources brought up in the AFD discussion find their way into article relatively soon. Many thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 07:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Thomas Mills Wood

Thomas Mills Wood (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO. Unable to find any coverage independent of the subject in any reliable sources. I'm not sure role in the The Fugitive and U.S. Marshals are considered significant. J04n( talk page) 19:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Thanks to Bejnar, the rogerebert.com citation is enough to verify. It's been a long time since I watched these but I think the role was prominent enough to meet WP:NACTOR. There seem also to be more citations under "Tom Wood", for example [1] [2]siro χ o 00:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes WP:NACTOR; he’s had significant roles in The Fugitive & U.S. Marshals and Ulee’s Gold. The Film Creator ( talk) 15:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. First, as passing at least WP:NACTOR (going by the Tribune article The Fugitive is probably less of a central role than U.S. Marshals & Ulee's Gold, but all appear to meet NACTOR's requirement of significant roles). Second, because unless the Tribune article is a complete one-off he appears very likely to pass WP:NBIO as well; his hopelessly un-Googleable name isn't helping. Finally, because it would be extraordinary (and a sign that our own criteria were seriously out of whack) if six other Wikipedias had organically acquired articles on this fellow and he still didn't measure up. -- Visviva ( talk) 01:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Again, please let's have sources brought up in the AFD discussion find their way into article relatively soon. Many thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 07:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Thomas Mills Wood

Thomas Mills Wood (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO. Unable to find any coverage independent of the subject in any reliable sources. I'm not sure role in the The Fugitive and U.S. Marshals are considered significant. J04n( talk page) 19:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Thanks to Bejnar, the rogerebert.com citation is enough to verify. It's been a long time since I watched these but I think the role was prominent enough to meet WP:NACTOR. There seem also to be more citations under "Tom Wood", for example [1] [2]siro χ o 00:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes WP:NACTOR; he’s had significant roles in The Fugitive & U.S. Marshals and Ulee’s Gold. The Film Creator ( talk) 15:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. First, as passing at least WP:NACTOR (going by the Tribune article The Fugitive is probably less of a central role than U.S. Marshals & Ulee's Gold, but all appear to meet NACTOR's requirement of significant roles). Second, because unless the Tribune article is a complete one-off he appears very likely to pass WP:NBIO as well; his hopelessly un-Googleable name isn't helping. Finally, because it would be extraordinary (and a sign that our own criteria were seriously out of whack) if six other Wikipedias had organically acquired articles on this fellow and he still didn't measure up. -- Visviva ( talk) 01:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook