The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Blatant violation of WP:BLP. It seems like an almost direct copy of the one reference given. There is no evidence of notability and no in-line citations. Also there has been no attempts to improve the article since it was tagged in May 2010. I'm struggling to see such a purpose for the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 13:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Blatant violation of WP:BLP. It seems like an almost direct copy of the one reference given. There is no evidence of notability and no in-line citations. Also there has been no attempts to improve the article since it was tagged in May 2010. I'm struggling to see such a purpose for the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 13:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC) reply