- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 02:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thomas Brierley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find this article really confusing, and couldn't establish that it meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. He lived, worked, had a mysterious headstone made, and died. No indication of notability. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 01:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The article is a bit confusing and could use a better distribution of references throughout the text. If the original author has more, it would be good for them to be added. The section on Freemasonry comes a bit abruptly in the story, and more should probably be said about the person who is subject of the article prior to introducing a general statement on Freemasonry. Other than that, you cannot LaMona ( talk) 02:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC) expect many more references about something that took place in 1854. The fact that there are any at all is notable. I'm game to do some editing, but have no access to the resources, so would need the help of the original author.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 02:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thomas Brierley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find this article really confusing, and couldn't establish that it meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. He lived, worked, had a mysterious headstone made, and died. No indication of notability. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 01:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The article is a bit confusing and could use a better distribution of references throughout the text. If the original author has more, it would be good for them to be added. The section on Freemasonry comes a bit abruptly in the story, and more should probably be said about the person who is subject of the article prior to introducing a general statement on Freemasonry. Other than that, you cannot LaMona ( talk) 02:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC) expect many more references about something that took place in 1854. The fact that there are any at all is notable. I'm game to do some editing, but have no access to the resources, so would need the help of the original author.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.