From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 01:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources for this guy, and he already has none on his article. Article doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 ( talk) 01:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete generically named supporting character from a minor spinoff that had only seven appearances in a 60-something-years-old franchise, which admittedly is an improvement over the “two works and it’s notable” gang like Nobody No-One and Nimrod (Doctor Who). Dronebogus ( talk) 01:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 01:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources for this guy, and he already has none on his article. Article doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 ( talk) 01:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete generically named supporting character from a minor spinoff that had only seven appearances in a 60-something-years-old franchise, which admittedly is an improvement over the “two works and it’s notable” gang like Nobody No-One and Nimrod (Doctor Who). Dronebogus ( talk) 01:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook