From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Theo Ruth

Theo Ruth (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete He indeed fails WP:NHOCKEY. He only played in college and secondary leagues. His AHL and Junior Championships appearences are not enough for him to pass the threshold. RS sources which cover him independently are very meager. Some routine mentions in match and draft reports and thats basically it. No significant independent coverage focused on him as person. He therefore fails WP:GNG too. He is now retired anyway, so it is unlikely he will become notable per his ice hockey achievements in the future. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary ( talk) 18:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Theo Ruth

Theo Ruth (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete He indeed fails WP:NHOCKEY. He only played in college and secondary leagues. His AHL and Junior Championships appearences are not enough for him to pass the threshold. RS sources which cover him independently are very meager. Some routine mentions in match and draft reports and thats basically it. No significant independent coverage focused on him as person. He therefore fails WP:GNG too. He is now retired anyway, so it is unlikely he will become notable per his ice hockey achievements in the future. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary ( talk) 18:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook