The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, a bunch of coverage in Italian sources (under its original title Il mistero di Dante), eg.
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9].
Cavarrone 06:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Update: Sure, it's one thing for me to simply use a little
RESEARCH and then declare a topic as notable, its a different animal to actually show it though regular editing. However, I do not understand how any diligent
WP:BEFORE could have led to the erroneous conclusion that this topic did not meet
WP:NF. The
meager stub first brought to AFD as non-notable WAS improvable, and so has been markedly
expanded and sourced. Yes, the sources are all in Italian, but that does not matter for where film notability is concerned. What does matter for determining topic notability, even for unsourced stubs, is
WP:NRVE. Might
the nominator consider withdrawing his easily dis-proven determination of non-notability? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, a bunch of coverage in Italian sources (under its original title Il mistero di Dante), eg.
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9].
Cavarrone 06:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Update: Sure, it's one thing for me to simply use a little
RESEARCH and then declare a topic as notable, its a different animal to actually show it though regular editing. However, I do not understand how any diligent
WP:BEFORE could have led to the erroneous conclusion that this topic did not meet
WP:NF. The
meager stub first brought to AFD as non-notable WAS improvable, and so has been markedly
expanded and sourced. Yes, the sources are all in Italian, but that does not matter for where film notability is concerned. What does matter for determining topic notability, even for unsourced stubs, is
WP:NRVE. Might
the nominator consider withdrawing his easily dis-proven determination of non-notability? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.