The result was Delete per #3 at WP:NOQUORUM. The argument that the story is notable because the one review in the article gives the overall show 4.5 stars is a synthesis. Credible case presented that the article fails WP:GNG. - Euryalus ( talk) 13:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD. reason was "Non notable vocal recording" Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply
I contest the above comment, The show was a collection of pieces, carefully selected and directed to form a single stage production. Without any one of the acts the overall production would not have received the many 4 out of 5 star reviews it has currently received. These reviews are easily found online, with a little research Borock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.237.203 ( talk) 09:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per #3 at WP:NOQUORUM. The argument that the story is notable because the one review in the article gives the overall show 4.5 stars is a synthesis. Credible case presented that the article fails WP:GNG. - Euryalus ( talk) 13:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD. reason was "Non notable vocal recording" Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC) reply
I contest the above comment, The show was a collection of pieces, carefully selected and directed to form a single stage production. Without any one of the acts the overall production would not have received the many 4 out of 5 star reviews it has currently received. These reviews are easily found online, with a little research Borock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.237.203 ( talk) 09:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) reply