From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rob Lacey. plicit 05:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The Word on the Street (book)

The Word on the Street (book) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable work. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: This is taking a lot of digging, but offhand I'm leaning towards this being notable. There's not a lot of traditional coverage for this like there would be for say, a novel, but there were places writing about this. I think that this should either have its own article or be merged into the author's page, since I'm seeing some mild coverage for him as well. I think that we could justify a single page on him or the book, but probably not both. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 15:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into author's article. I think that this would be better served having an article for the author, as quite a bit of the coverage talks about his creative process and some of his personal information. Per what I wrote above, we could have an article on one or the other, but not really both and I think that a page on the author would likely serve readers better. I've merged info from this article into the main article in anticipation of this. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 16:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Rob Lacey where the content has been selectively merged, no need for a seperate article now, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rob Lacey. plicit 05:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The Word on the Street (book)

The Word on the Street (book) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable work. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 05:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: This is taking a lot of digging, but offhand I'm leaning towards this being notable. There's not a lot of traditional coverage for this like there would be for say, a novel, but there were places writing about this. I think that this should either have its own article or be merged into the author's page, since I'm seeing some mild coverage for him as well. I think that we could justify a single page on him or the book, but probably not both. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 15:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into author's article. I think that this would be better served having an article for the author, as quite a bit of the coverage talks about his creative process and some of his personal information. Per what I wrote above, we could have an article on one or the other, but not really both and I think that a page on the author would likely serve readers better. I've merged info from this article into the main article in anticipation of this. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 16:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Rob Lacey where the content has been selectively merged, no need for a seperate article now, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook