The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete This was deleted before as a G11, and the user was given good advice on how to improve it by @
Chrislk02:, but decided to ignore it and recreate this non-notable article. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Winner 42: Could we move it back to draftspace? At their talkpages and Chrislk02's talkpage, they have said they didn't intend to republish it.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
I have no problem with this. Speedily draft it if you wish.
Winner 42Talk to me! 16:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Now all these other people have commented, I feel like "Speedy move" to draftspace wouldn't be appropriate, unless they all agree to it.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 17:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The version previously moved back to draft at
User:Mthiesse/draft is a copyvio of
[1]. I don't see the point of multiple user drafts, especially as the creator is not engaging in any discussion.
Bazj (
talk) 17:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect to Mendham Borough Elementary schools are infrequently notable; Nursery schools even more rarely. There is nothing here to establish notability, nor could I find anything in a Google search to add to what's in the article that would meet the GNG standard. A redirect will preserve the link and any meaningful will be merged into the parent article.
Alansohn (
talk) 16:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to borough. No meaningful hits in the major news databases (
LexisNexis,
ProQuest,
Google Books/
Scholar). Possible that there are offline or non-English sources, and please ping me if you find them. I'm skeptical about the need for a redirect without having secondary source coverage, but whatever, at the very least, it doesn't make sense to stay
in draftspace since the secondary sources do not exist. –
czar 17:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
I am the writer of the Westmont wiki page. I'm sorry for my novice mistakes. I have added more citations and links, as it was suggested to me to do. Although they are a primary school they are heavily involved in the community and I feel that they are worthy of a wiki page.
Mthiesse (
talk) 17:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Czar: Do the new citations and links I have added help the page?
Mthiesse (
talk) 17:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Not quite. Articles require
significant coverage in multiple
reliable,
independent sources (
?) to warrant their own pages. The article's current sourcing consists of passing mentions and listings, not any in-depth coverage about the school. I did a search myself, as mentioned above, and didn't find more. Redirection is the best fate for this article until it has more media coverage. –
czar 23:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete This was deleted before as a G11, and the user was given good advice on how to improve it by @
Chrislk02:, but decided to ignore it and recreate this non-notable article. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Winner 42: Could we move it back to draftspace? At their talkpages and Chrislk02's talkpage, they have said they didn't intend to republish it.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
I have no problem with this. Speedily draft it if you wish.
Winner 42Talk to me! 16:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Now all these other people have commented, I feel like "Speedy move" to draftspace wouldn't be appropriate, unless they all agree to it.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 17:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The version previously moved back to draft at
User:Mthiesse/draft is a copyvio of
[1]. I don't see the point of multiple user drafts, especially as the creator is not engaging in any discussion.
Bazj (
talk) 17:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge / Redirect to Mendham Borough Elementary schools are infrequently notable; Nursery schools even more rarely. There is nothing here to establish notability, nor could I find anything in a Google search to add to what's in the article that would meet the GNG standard. A redirect will preserve the link and any meaningful will be merged into the parent article.
Alansohn (
talk) 16:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to borough. No meaningful hits in the major news databases (
LexisNexis,
ProQuest,
Google Books/
Scholar). Possible that there are offline or non-English sources, and please ping me if you find them. I'm skeptical about the need for a redirect without having secondary source coverage, but whatever, at the very least, it doesn't make sense to stay
in draftspace since the secondary sources do not exist. –
czar 17:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
I am the writer of the Westmont wiki page. I'm sorry for my novice mistakes. I have added more citations and links, as it was suggested to me to do. Although they are a primary school they are heavily involved in the community and I feel that they are worthy of a wiki page.
Mthiesse (
talk) 17:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Czar: Do the new citations and links I have added help the page?
Mthiesse (
talk) 17:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Not quite. Articles require
significant coverage in multiple
reliable,
independent sources (
?) to warrant their own pages. The article's current sourcing consists of passing mentions and listings, not any in-depth coverage about the school. I did a search myself, as mentioned above, and didn't find more. Redirection is the best fate for this article until it has more media coverage. –
czar 23:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.