From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This is a technical non-consensus close for all these articles on the basis of S.O.'s two comment and the comment from Pichpich. They can be renominated individually at any time. DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply

The Timid Toreador

The Timid Toreador (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whole article is copy paste from another wikia http://looneytunes.wikia.com/wiki/The_Timid_Toreador Beside IMDB is given as sole reference Sulaimandaud ( talk) 20:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because of same reason, all copied from http://looneytunes.wikia.com/:

Porky's Garden (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Village Smithy (1936 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Bird Came C.O.D. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Detouring America (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sport Chumpions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Sulaimandaud ( talk) 20:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. The Looney Toons wiki licenses] all of its works CC-BY-SA 3.0, which is a Wikipedia-compatible license (if attribution is maintained). A link to the article history there would satisfy the attribution requirement, so this doesn't necessarily need to be deleted solely on the copyvio grounds. That said, it's also not very helpful, being exclusively an unsourced plot summary with excessive detail for this project's purposes. Treating the topic on the merits, there are a few potential sources, but its debatable whether any of them constitute significant coverage; I'm neutral as to the outcome here, but a redirect to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1940–49) would be preferable to deletion. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 20:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
I've added the proper attribution for The Village Smithy (1936 film). The copyright issues can all be resolved similarly. Pichpich ( talk) 20:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Update: I've fixed all 6 attribution problems. The question remains: do we keep these articles separate or merge them to a common target? But this is not an AfD question since deleting is not among the reasonable options so I suggest closing this AfD. Pichpich ( talk) 21:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Or, at least, close on procedural grounds. When I first commented on this AFD, "The Timid Toreador" was the only article listed. Because the cause for deletion here is going to come down to notability rather than copyright issues, bundling is doing more harm than good; the works will need to be considered on their individual merits. "The Village Smithy", for example, has been recognized as an early use of parody in Tex Avery's works, which might distinguish it from titles like "Porky's Garden" that are primary addressed only in comprehensive animation surveys (but that may themselves satisfy inclusion requirements). There's just no way that these can be evaluated in an omnibus AFD. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 21:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This is a technical non-consensus close for all these articles on the basis of S.O.'s two comment and the comment from Pichpich. They can be renominated individually at any time. DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply

The Timid Toreador

The Timid Toreador (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whole article is copy paste from another wikia http://looneytunes.wikia.com/wiki/The_Timid_Toreador Beside IMDB is given as sole reference Sulaimandaud ( talk) 20:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because of same reason, all copied from http://looneytunes.wikia.com/:

Porky's Garden (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Village Smithy (1936 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Bird Came C.O.D. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Detouring America (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sport Chumpions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Sulaimandaud ( talk) 20:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. The Looney Toons wiki licenses] all of its works CC-BY-SA 3.0, which is a Wikipedia-compatible license (if attribution is maintained). A link to the article history there would satisfy the attribution requirement, so this doesn't necessarily need to be deleted solely on the copyvio grounds. That said, it's also not very helpful, being exclusively an unsourced plot summary with excessive detail for this project's purposes. Treating the topic on the merits, there are a few potential sources, but its debatable whether any of them constitute significant coverage; I'm neutral as to the outcome here, but a redirect to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1940–49) would be preferable to deletion. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 20:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
I've added the proper attribution for The Village Smithy (1936 film). The copyright issues can all be resolved similarly. Pichpich ( talk) 20:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Update: I've fixed all 6 attribution problems. The question remains: do we keep these articles separate or merge them to a common target? But this is not an AfD question since deleting is not among the reasonable options so I suggest closing this AfD. Pichpich ( talk) 21:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Or, at least, close on procedural grounds. When I first commented on this AFD, "The Timid Toreador" was the only article listed. Because the cause for deletion here is going to come down to notability rather than copyright issues, bundling is doing more harm than good; the works will need to be considered on their individual merits. "The Village Smithy", for example, has been recognized as an early use of parody in Tex Avery's works, which might distinguish it from titles like "Porky's Garden" that are primary addressed only in comprehensive animation surveys (but that may themselves satisfy inclusion requirements). There's just no way that these can be evaluated in an omnibus AFD. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 21:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook