The result was Delete, since the lack of in depth coverage by reliable sources has not been overcome. Tikiwont ( talk) 09:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website that fails WP:RS. The references given are merely from other non-notable websites. The article was created by two of the guys who blog at the site [1]. If that wasn't enough, they then had the gall to use the article to link to their own Wikipedia user pages [2]. What's next? I guess they'll be showing up here soon to tell us how notable they are. Qworty ( talk) 01:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, since the lack of in depth coverage by reliable sources has not been overcome. Tikiwont ( talk) 09:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website that fails WP:RS. The references given are merely from other non-notable websites. The article was created by two of the guys who blog at the site [1]. If that wasn't enough, they then had the gall to use the article to link to their own Wikipedia user pages [2]. What's next? I guess they'll be showing up here soon to tell us how notable they are. Qworty ( talk) 01:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC) reply