- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- The Revenge: Geeta Mera Naam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. The sources it cites do not constitute independent, reliable coverage.
Source 1 is an IMDB-type entry.
Source 2 is just a box office stats site with no analysis of the film itself.
Source 3 is all plot and gives no major review.
Source 4 is just a cast list on Ranker, which has no editorial oversight. DrStrauss talk 11:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NFSOURCES & WP:NFO - no significant/in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Shearonink ( talk) 16:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- The Revenge: Geeta Mera Naam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. The sources it cites do not constitute independent, reliable coverage.
Source 1 is an IMDB-type entry.
Source 2 is just a box office stats site with no analysis of the film itself.
Source 3 is all plot and gives no major review.
Source 4 is just a cast list on Ranker, which has no editorial oversight. DrStrauss talk 11:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NFSOURCES & WP:NFO - no significant/in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Shearonink ( talk) 16:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.