The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of those are significant coverage. The first is a photo caption, the second is a list of films, I can't open the NYT and the fourth is from a non-reliable-source website.
Oaktree b (
talk)
20:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
....you can’t open the NYT... well, that’s too bad, really....it’s significant enough. And so are the awards, for which the first sources are presented. Just look them up. As for the last source, I don’t know the site but insisted l mentioned it for what it was worth (Please try and read my comment more carefully when you reply, thanks.) This film is clearly notable. Maybe
this,
this, this
brief mention based on a interview, in the Chicago Tribune and
this review in
The Christian Science Monitor and
this one in the Sun Sentinel will help. No further comment. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)20:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Ok, I'll give you the NYT, I'm able to sort of see the headline in the NYT link above. With the other (Christian Science and the Florida paper), should be ok.
Oaktree b (
talk)
22:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as the New York Times, Sun Sentinel, Dove Foundation and others so that
WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
22:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: Much better than it was, but I question a couple of the sources, particularly in the Awards section. One award is sourced from a photo caption in Jet magazine and another from a book published by Lulu.com, which is a vanity press.
Just Another Cringy Username (
talk)
18:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of those are significant coverage. The first is a photo caption, the second is a list of films, I can't open the NYT and the fourth is from a non-reliable-source website.
Oaktree b (
talk)
20:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
....you can’t open the NYT... well, that’s too bad, really....it’s significant enough. And so are the awards, for which the first sources are presented. Just look them up. As for the last source, I don’t know the site but insisted l mentioned it for what it was worth (Please try and read my comment more carefully when you reply, thanks.) This film is clearly notable. Maybe
this,
this, this
brief mention based on a interview, in the Chicago Tribune and
this review in
The Christian Science Monitor and
this one in the Sun Sentinel will help. No further comment. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)20:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Ok, I'll give you the NYT, I'm able to sort of see the headline in the NYT link above. With the other (Christian Science and the Florida paper), should be ok.
Oaktree b (
talk)
22:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as the New York Times, Sun Sentinel, Dove Foundation and others so that
WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
22:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: Much better than it was, but I question a couple of the sources, particularly in the Awards section. One award is sourced from a photo caption in Jet magazine and another from a book published by Lulu.com, which is a vanity press.
Just Another Cringy Username (
talk)
18:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.