The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hmmm. All tags, declined Prod and Afd by the same user today....for a Oliver Hardy film, stating bluntly that it is ’’non notable (per google search)’’ is in my view a bit extreme. At the very least a redirect should have been considered. Still, my !vote is that this being 1 of the few films Hardy directed for Vim it can have its own article. So Keep. Added a few sources for verification (and removed the 1 source tag that had been added today...) . The film plot was added and adding it to Hardy’s filmo would not be easy, which is one more reason to keep the page as a standalone article.-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)22:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: for a film as old as this, the likelihood that Google is going to find coverage is unlikely. You're gonna wanna check US newspaper/magazine archives for this one. Also worth noting that
WP:BEFORE says the bare minimum isn't just a regular Google search, but also Google Books, News, and News archive, plus suggesting Google Scholar and The Wikipedia Library. Not to assume anything, but "per google search" doesn't immediately suggest to me that you were as thorough as asked.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
10:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per
User:Mushy Yank and
User:Roman Spinner above. While existing coverage is thin its role in Hardy's career is extensive enough it definately shouldn't be a red link and for a film of this vintage hard copy sources are likely to exist so a simple Google search is abviously inadequate to demonstrate non-notability.
Eluchil404 (
talk)
01:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hmmm. All tags, declined Prod and Afd by the same user today....for a Oliver Hardy film, stating bluntly that it is ’’non notable (per google search)’’ is in my view a bit extreme. At the very least a redirect should have been considered. Still, my !vote is that this being 1 of the few films Hardy directed for Vim it can have its own article. So Keep. Added a few sources for verification (and removed the 1 source tag that had been added today...) . The film plot was added and adding it to Hardy’s filmo would not be easy, which is one more reason to keep the page as a standalone article.-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)22:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: for a film as old as this, the likelihood that Google is going to find coverage is unlikely. You're gonna wanna check US newspaper/magazine archives for this one. Also worth noting that
WP:BEFORE says the bare minimum isn't just a regular Google search, but also Google Books, News, and News archive, plus suggesting Google Scholar and The Wikipedia Library. Not to assume anything, but "per google search" doesn't immediately suggest to me that you were as thorough as asked.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
10:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per
User:Mushy Yank and
User:Roman Spinner above. While existing coverage is thin its role in Hardy's career is extensive enough it definately shouldn't be a red link and for a film of this vintage hard copy sources are likely to exist so a simple Google search is abviously inadequate to demonstrate non-notability.
Eluchil404 (
talk)
01:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.