The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment. I'm not sure how much of the current article could be sourced. There are sources out there that would permit a brief article (
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4]), and there may be more offline given the time the band were at their peak, but
WP:TNT perhaps applies here. --
Michig (
talk)
08:39, 20 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I've reverted back to an earlier revision of the article, before large amounts of unsourced puffery was added. Please can you comment on this version?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333(talk)(cont)13:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Where are the in-depth sources indicating notability? The article now has two sources. The first one is barely more than a passing mention – way short of in-depth. The second is a broken link, and in any case described as a press release. Press releases are not considered evidence of notability.
SpinningSpark14:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The article was aboud the American band when the AFD was started but is now about the British band again. Revisions should be moved so there is an article about each band - last time I mentioned this I was told it could not be done but it doesn't look too difficult as there are few revisions and it was complete replacement rather than a change through a series of edits.
Peter James (
talk)
19:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment. I'm not sure how much of the current article could be sourced. There are sources out there that would permit a brief article (
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4]), and there may be more offline given the time the band were at their peak, but
WP:TNT perhaps applies here. --
Michig (
talk)
08:39, 20 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I've reverted back to an earlier revision of the article, before large amounts of unsourced puffery was added. Please can you comment on this version?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333(talk)(cont)13:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Where are the in-depth sources indicating notability? The article now has two sources. The first one is barely more than a passing mention – way short of in-depth. The second is a broken link, and in any case described as a press release. Press releases are not considered evidence of notability.
SpinningSpark14:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The article was aboud the American band when the AFD was started but is now about the British band again. Revisions should be moved so there is an article about each band - last time I mentioned this I was told it could not be done but it doesn't look too difficult as there are few revisions and it was complete replacement rather than a change through a series of edits.
Peter James (
talk)
19:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.