- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
The Leith Agency
- The Leith Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notable in Leith. Not notable on Wikipedia. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Added sources. Extensive coverage in Scottish press; also some in UK advertising/marketing trade publications (Campaign, Marketing Week, Creative Review) and UK-wide business press. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Added Hoover's ref. Now is WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 03:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable. Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
The Leith Agency
- The Leith Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notable in Leith. Not notable on Wikipedia. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Added sources. Extensive coverage in Scottish press; also some in UK advertising/marketing trade publications (Campaign, Marketing Week, Creative Review) and UK-wide business press. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Added Hoover's ref. Now is WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 03:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable. Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.