The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A valid disambugiation. If there were only two items, one could sort them with hatnotes, here there are 4. Tone19:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary disambiguation, since it only points to items within the series of the same name. The series article does the same job, better. ZXCVBNM (
TALK)10:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)reply
As a
WP:THREEDABS, it's well within the threshold where that can be contained in a hatnote. There aren't so many entries also named "The Legend of Zelda" that is requires a disambiguation page. This is made even more redundant by the fact that they are all in the same series.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)07:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment How likely would someone searching for it be looking for cartoon series or the manga? I don't think they'd have any trouble finding them if they were looking for them. Pageviews: 1,153 in the past 90 days so someone must be coming here. No shortages of space on Wikipedia. I don't care whether its kept or deleted.
DreamFocus01:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Well yeah, it has pageviews since it's linked from the top of the Zelda article. Most likely all those people will just close the page once they realize it's a dupe of the series article. It's an active hindrance, not a help.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A valid disambugiation. If there were only two items, one could sort them with hatnotes, here there are 4. Tone19:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary disambiguation, since it only points to items within the series of the same name. The series article does the same job, better. ZXCVBNM (
TALK)10:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)reply
As a
WP:THREEDABS, it's well within the threshold where that can be contained in a hatnote. There aren't so many entries also named "The Legend of Zelda" that is requires a disambiguation page. This is made even more redundant by the fact that they are all in the same series.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)07:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment How likely would someone searching for it be looking for cartoon series or the manga? I don't think they'd have any trouble finding them if they were looking for them. Pageviews: 1,153 in the past 90 days so someone must be coming here. No shortages of space on Wikipedia. I don't care whether its kept or deleted.
DreamFocus01:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Well yeah, it has pageviews since it's linked from the top of the Zelda article. Most likely all those people will just close the page once they realize it's a dupe of the series article. It's an active hindrance, not a help.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)12:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.