From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. This allows the possibiilty of article restoration should sources be located. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The K-Otics

The K-Otics (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline on WP:BAND. Hard to say, as the main source in the article is this blog. Possibly passes #11, as the article states the band got heavy rotation on WBAM; I'm not sure if this is considered a "major radio" network. Also potentially passes #5, as they had one single released on Bang Records, and another single potentially(?) released on FAME Records (if FAME can be considered a "major record label"). Ambiguity could be cleared up if I could find online sources, but there are few ( [1]). Perhaps someone has access to other media to help this article pass notability guidelines. Mbdfar ( talk) 00:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. This allows the possibiilty of article restoration should sources be located. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The K-Otics

The K-Otics (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline on WP:BAND. Hard to say, as the main source in the article is this blog. Possibly passes #11, as the article states the band got heavy rotation on WBAM; I'm not sure if this is considered a "major radio" network. Also potentially passes #5, as they had one single released on Bang Records, and another single potentially(?) released on FAME Records (if FAME can be considered a "major record label"). Ambiguity could be cleared up if I could find online sources, but there are few ( [1]). Perhaps someone has access to other media to help this article pass notability guidelines. Mbdfar ( talk) 00:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook