- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 02:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- The Haunted Thundermans ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see why this episode is notable. The only information listed is plot and cast. Dcbanners ( talk) 11:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 12:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a disambiguation page with a short summary and entries for each episode list. Article as it stands here as nominated for deletion does not meet WP:GNG for a stand-alone-article and significant independent coverage in reliable sources to support an article does not exist. Ratings and short episode guide summaries are all that can be referenced and are in the episode list articles. Plot summary is from viewing episode itself, a primary source insufficient to support an article. It just restates information at List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes#ep35 and List of The Thundermans episodes#ep25. The major reason to have this article is the fact that it is common to two different shows and having the common info in one article is better for maintenance. The common info is limited, though, so some redundancy in two articles is not unwieldy. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 16:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I changed the article to be a disambiguation page as I suggested above. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 17:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep in present form. Dcbanners, what do you think of it as it now is? Would you consider retracting the nomination? Boleyn ( talk) 08:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 02:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- The Haunted Thundermans ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see why this episode is notable. The only information listed is plot and cast. Dcbanners ( talk) 11:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 12:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a disambiguation page with a short summary and entries for each episode list. Article as it stands here as nominated for deletion does not meet WP:GNG for a stand-alone-article and significant independent coverage in reliable sources to support an article does not exist. Ratings and short episode guide summaries are all that can be referenced and are in the episode list articles. Plot summary is from viewing episode itself, a primary source insufficient to support an article. It just restates information at List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes#ep35 and List of The Thundermans episodes#ep25. The major reason to have this article is the fact that it is common to two different shows and having the common info in one article is better for maintenance. The common info is limited, though, so some redundancy in two articles is not unwieldy. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 16:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I changed the article to be a disambiguation page as I suggested above. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 17:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep in present form. Dcbanners, what do you think of it as it now is? Would you consider retracting the nomination? Boleyn ( talk) 08:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.