The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - The cited sources are misleading, since with a quick look, they appear to be about the subject. However, as explained by Cryptic above, they are not - they are simply using the same pun to refer to angry/abusive fans, and not talking about the specific group that this article is about. We already have
severaldifferentarticles where explanations of the fandom and the reception to the sequel trilogy are already present, as well, making this redundant as well as unnotable.
Rorshacma (
talk)
14:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect to
Star Wars fandom. Looking at the restoring editor's work re-creating this content, it's possible they'll massage some of the phrasing around cited sources in such a way as they might be worth merging to the fandom article and we'd want the revision history. However, the article is misleading in asserting that this is a "group"; it instead seems to be a catch-all pun for various disgruntled fans. As a
neologism, Wikipedia frowns on setting up an article on this kind of termphrase. And as an aspect of fandom, this is better addressed at the basic fandom article (and isn't so notable or massive in content/coverage as to warrant a content fork). --
EEMIV (
talk)
18:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - The cited sources are misleading, since with a quick look, they appear to be about the subject. However, as explained by Cryptic above, they are not - they are simply using the same pun to refer to angry/abusive fans, and not talking about the specific group that this article is about. We already have
severaldifferentarticles where explanations of the fandom and the reception to the sequel trilogy are already present, as well, making this redundant as well as unnotable.
Rorshacma (
talk)
14:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect to
Star Wars fandom. Looking at the restoring editor's work re-creating this content, it's possible they'll massage some of the phrasing around cited sources in such a way as they might be worth merging to the fandom article and we'd want the revision history. However, the article is misleading in asserting that this is a "group"; it instead seems to be a catch-all pun for various disgruntled fans. As a
neologism, Wikipedia frowns on setting up an article on this kind of termphrase. And as an aspect of fandom, this is better addressed at the basic fandom article (and isn't so notable or massive in content/coverage as to warrant a content fork). --
EEMIV (
talk)
18:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.