- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's been more than a month, and only two people have participated—the nom and the article's creator. Since both advocate deletion, so be it. Deor ( talk) 11:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- The ErlKing (film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Short film who's only claim to notability is that it was shown at Sundance. Fails WP:NF Darx9url ( talk) 14:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment from article creator. I must say I didn't recall having created this -- but there I am, all right. For an animated short, I'd suggest that the Animation World Network capsule review cited in the article could be considered one example of significant secondary coverage. I've been able to find a record of what appear to be two short reviews in librarian publications, fwiw. I am rather surprised that I created this. I have some vague recollection that this was a split from some other work or similarly named article. I make it a point to never create a WP:ONESOURCE article—or so I thought—and I for one would have no objection if the article cannot be saved. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- I'd checked some of those -- checked the rest since. Nuttin there. You did a nice job expanding the article but I don't see the significant indie coverage that's gonna sway anyone, I think. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- If this indeed going to be deleted, it would be ideal to
WP:PRESERVE a mention in the main article on the Goethe work. Problem is, all such popular work were unceremoniously blanked
here, which is quite a loss. I'll try to recreate that as a list.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
12:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've created it as List of works based on Der Erlkönig. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete So at this point the article creator (me!) !votes delete, if only to move this along. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (discuss) @ 19:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's been more than a month, and only two people have participated—the nom and the article's creator. Since both advocate deletion, so be it. Deor ( talk) 11:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- The ErlKing (film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Short film who's only claim to notability is that it was shown at Sundance. Fails WP:NF Darx9url ( talk) 14:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment from article creator. I must say I didn't recall having created this -- but there I am, all right. For an animated short, I'd suggest that the Animation World Network capsule review cited in the article could be considered one example of significant secondary coverage. I've been able to find a record of what appear to be two short reviews in librarian publications, fwiw. I am rather surprised that I created this. I have some vague recollection that this was a split from some other work or similarly named article. I make it a point to never create a WP:ONESOURCE article—or so I thought—and I for one would have no objection if the article cannot be saved. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- I'd checked some of those -- checked the rest since. Nuttin there. You did a nice job expanding the article but I don't see the significant indie coverage that's gonna sway anyone, I think. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- If this indeed going to be deleted, it would be ideal to
WP:PRESERVE a mention in the main article on the Goethe work. Problem is, all such popular work were unceremoniously blanked
here, which is quite a loss. I'll try to recreate that as a list.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
12:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've created it as List of works based on Der Erlkönig. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete So at this point the article creator (me!) !votes delete, if only to move this along. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (discuss) @ 19:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.