- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The Early Coorgs
- The Early Coorgs ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Seems to be part of a self-promotional thing by the author. See this discussion (permalink - the discussion may grow yet). Sitush ( talk) 13:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- NB: I am not saying that the article creator is the author of the book. But the book has been inserted at various articles in a manner that makes me think those insertions were by the author. And the creator Kanga Roo in the Zoo ( talk · contribs) has edited the user page of the contributor whom I think may be the author of the books. - Sitush ( talk) 13:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am also nominating the following related pages because of the inherent connection - same author, amateur historian, fails GNG etc:
- Delete all of them. The limited coverage of the author and his books are relatively trivial puff pieces. Fails WP:Notability. First Light ( talk) 14:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the bunch: lack of evidence of notability. I've had interactions with the creator before, too, and they did not inspire confidence as to their knowledge of policy. Vanamonde ( talk) 17:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The Early Coorgs
- The Early Coorgs ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Seems to be part of a self-promotional thing by the author. See this discussion (permalink - the discussion may grow yet). Sitush ( talk) 13:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- NB: I am not saying that the article creator is the author of the book. But the book has been inserted at various articles in a manner that makes me think those insertions were by the author. And the creator Kanga Roo in the Zoo ( talk · contribs) has edited the user page of the contributor whom I think may be the author of the books. - Sitush ( talk) 13:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am also nominating the following related pages because of the inherent connection - same author, amateur historian, fails GNG etc:
- Delete all of them. The limited coverage of the author and his books are relatively trivial puff pieces. Fails WP:Notability. First Light ( talk) 14:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the bunch: lack of evidence of notability. I've had interactions with the creator before, too, and they did not inspire confidence as to their knowledge of policy. Vanamonde ( talk) 17:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.