The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Doesn't appear to be notable, as there are no independent sources cited.
Figureofnine (
talk) 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Pure spam without any major coverage in external sources. /
ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Doesn't appear to be notable, as there are no independent sources cited.
Figureofnine (
talk) 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Pure spam without any major coverage in external sources. /
ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.