From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merge is possible as well. Tone 07:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The Arminian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't appear to clear WP:GNG or WP:NNEWSPAPER. Other than sharing a name with the more significant Wesleyan Methodist Magazine, it doesn't appear to have a claim to notability, and while the article appears to imply that these two publications have editorial continuity, no evidence in the sources cited confirms this. signed, Rosguill talk 03:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Sorry if the article seemed to imply editorial continuity with the earlier magazine. To remedy that, I have added the following sentence to the article: "The Arminian does not have editorial continuity with Wesleyan Methodist Magazine." Mksword ( talk) 08:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply
While this is an appreciated change that improves the article, there still remains the matter of demonstrating notability, as neither of the sources given for the article are independent of the subject, and thus cannot be considered reliable sources for establishing notability. signed, Rosguill talk 05:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merge is possible as well. Tone 07:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The Arminian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't appear to clear WP:GNG or WP:NNEWSPAPER. Other than sharing a name with the more significant Wesleyan Methodist Magazine, it doesn't appear to have a claim to notability, and while the article appears to imply that these two publications have editorial continuity, no evidence in the sources cited confirms this. signed, Rosguill talk 03:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Sorry if the article seemed to imply editorial continuity with the earlier magazine. To remedy that, I have added the following sentence to the article: "The Arminian does not have editorial continuity with Wesleyan Methodist Magazine." Mksword ( talk) 08:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply
While this is an appreciated change that improves the article, there still remains the matter of demonstrating notability, as neither of the sources given for the article are independent of the subject, and thus cannot be considered reliable sources for establishing notability. signed, Rosguill talk 05:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook