- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
The Appearing
- The Appearing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References to Moviefone and Rotten Tomatoes do not constitute reliable secondary independent coverage. No evidence of real world notability. KDS4444 ( talk) 12:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete not even reported on by the typical niche horror outlets. Honestly pretty strange considering IMDB's $1mil estimated budget. Jergling ( talk) 19:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Strike that. Dread Central is apparently one of those outlets. Do they know their website is compromised? There's a sneaky script that links to a spamring if you click the header while it's still loading.-Jergling PC Load Letter 19:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)- Nevermind the nevermind. See below. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the film is reported on by Dread Central, which mentions it here as well as here. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 21:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Dread Central appears to be a spamblog, based on the procedural nature of those articles, the 0 comments on every article, the >50,000 Alexa rank, and the fact that every page has a malicious script that opens "findbetterresults.com" upon clicking random links. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment In addition, I have come across a video of the film's trailer at The New York Times website. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 01:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as has coverage in Dread Central and Horror News which are both reliable sources for the horror film genre, enabling a pass of WP:GNG Atlantic306 ( talk) 01:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
The Appearing
- The Appearing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References to Moviefone and Rotten Tomatoes do not constitute reliable secondary independent coverage. No evidence of real world notability. KDS4444 ( talk) 12:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete not even reported on by the typical niche horror outlets. Honestly pretty strange considering IMDB's $1mil estimated budget. Jergling ( talk) 19:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Strike that. Dread Central is apparently one of those outlets. Do they know their website is compromised? There's a sneaky script that links to a spamring if you click the header while it's still loading.-Jergling PC Load Letter 19:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)- Nevermind the nevermind. See below. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the film is reported on by Dread Central, which mentions it here as well as here. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 21:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Dread Central appears to be a spamblog, based on the procedural nature of those articles, the 0 comments on every article, the >50,000 Alexa rank, and the fact that every page has a malicious script that opens "findbetterresults.com" upon clicking random links. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment In addition, I have come across a video of the film's trailer at The New York Times website. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 01:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as has coverage in Dread Central and Horror News which are both reliable sources for the horror film genre, enabling a pass of WP:GNG Atlantic306 ( talk) 01:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.