- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No point in a third relisting given the lack of new participation. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thairiyam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The entire article survives on a single production source from The New Indian Express mostly consisting of quotes and a single review from The Hindu while two reliable reviews are needed for films. Behindwoods, Indiaglitz, and Top 10 Cinema are not reliable. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_353#Sify.com_and_Indiaglitzz says Indiaglitz is not great but acceptable. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Behindwoods.com says Behindwoods may be OK for Tamil films. Nothing says Top 10 cinema is not reliable. Also there's a (one line, but still) assessment at TV guide. So I'd say Keep.— MY, OH MY! (mushy yank)— 13:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - enough material is there for a 2010 film - a review from The Hindu shows its notability. Other sources that can be added include [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Neutral Fan ( talk) 16:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No point in a third relisting given the lack of new participation. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thairiyam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The entire article survives on a single production source from The New Indian Express mostly consisting of quotes and a single review from The Hindu while two reliable reviews are needed for films. Behindwoods, Indiaglitz, and Top 10 Cinema are not reliable. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_353#Sify.com_and_Indiaglitzz says Indiaglitz is not great but acceptable. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Behindwoods.com says Behindwoods may be OK for Tamil films. Nothing says Top 10 cinema is not reliable. Also there's a (one line, but still) assessment at TV guide. So I'd say Keep.— MY, OH MY! (mushy yank)— 13:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - enough material is there for a 2010 film - a review from The Hindu shows its notability. Other sources that can be added include [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Neutral Fan ( talk) 16:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.