The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Thanks, AllyD for the work StarMississippi 14:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Another contested draft with zero in-depth coverage and no improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 10:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Inadequate coverage. If we are going to have an English-language article about this venue, someone is going to need to do a better job of writing an article. --
Ssilvers (
talk) 22:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
KEEP, it's a great article.
Evangp (
talk) 13:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 11:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Even taking into account the sources on the French version, it fails
WP:GNG.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 11:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment:The present en.wiki article text is horribly truncated on the long history of this venue, which can be found described as "L'Eldorado, the aristocrat of the cafés-concerts"[1] and painted by Sickert
[2]. Note also that, as per the fr.wiki article, a "Patrimoine du XXe siècle" designation was placed on the 1933 cinema hall (which replaced the original cafés-concert hall):
[3].
AllyD (
talk) 12:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I have expanded the article to provide a summary reflecting the history of the Eldorado. More could surely be said about the performers there, but for the moment I included famous artworks by
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and
Walter Sickert; a performance there by
Félix Mayol may also be reflected in Proust: all of these perhaps fall under
WP:NOTINHERITED but indicate the Eldorado's cultural position in its era. Anyway, the French Culture Ministry's "Patrimoine du XXe siècle" designation of the later building (apparently somewhere between
Blue plaque and
Listed building status in the UK?) seems sufficient to demonstrate notability under
WP:NBUILD criterion 1.
AllyD (
talk) 14:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Clearly passes GNG in its current iteration. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep in light of expansion by AllyD per
WP:HEY, which clearly demonstrates historical notability of this 165-year-old venue per
WP:GNG. Obviously there is room for further expansion (and incorporation of additional sources, including books), but it's much better than when it was first nominated for deletion.
Cielquiparle (
talk) 08:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:HEY passes
WP:GNG on improving edits made by AllyD. Resonant
Distortion 18:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Thanks, AllyD for the work StarMississippi 14:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Another contested draft with zero in-depth coverage and no improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 10:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Inadequate coverage. If we are going to have an English-language article about this venue, someone is going to need to do a better job of writing an article. --
Ssilvers (
talk) 22:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
KEEP, it's a great article.
Evangp (
talk) 13:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 11:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Even taking into account the sources on the French version, it fails
WP:GNG.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 11:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment:The present en.wiki article text is horribly truncated on the long history of this venue, which can be found described as "L'Eldorado, the aristocrat of the cafés-concerts"[1] and painted by Sickert
[2]. Note also that, as per the fr.wiki article, a "Patrimoine du XXe siècle" designation was placed on the 1933 cinema hall (which replaced the original cafés-concert hall):
[3].
AllyD (
talk) 12:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I have expanded the article to provide a summary reflecting the history of the Eldorado. More could surely be said about the performers there, but for the moment I included famous artworks by
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and
Walter Sickert; a performance there by
Félix Mayol may also be reflected in Proust: all of these perhaps fall under
WP:NOTINHERITED but indicate the Eldorado's cultural position in its era. Anyway, the French Culture Ministry's "Patrimoine du XXe siècle" designation of the later building (apparently somewhere between
Blue plaque and
Listed building status in the UK?) seems sufficient to demonstrate notability under
WP:NBUILD criterion 1.
AllyD (
talk) 14:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Clearly passes GNG in its current iteration. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep in light of expansion by AllyD per
WP:HEY, which clearly demonstrates historical notability of this 165-year-old venue per
WP:GNG. Obviously there is room for further expansion (and incorporation of additional sources, including books), but it's much better than when it was first nominated for deletion.
Cielquiparle (
talk) 08:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:HEY passes
WP:GNG on improving edits made by AllyD. Resonant
Distortion 18:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.