The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There's clear consensus to delete here. Of the two people arguing to keep, one is the article's creator, and the other provided no policy-based arguments or sources. And, while Peter Rehse didn't provide a bolded, one-word statement, his analysis speaks to deletion.
@
Australianblackbelt:, if you like, I'll be happy to undelete this and move it back into your user space (or, even better, into draft space). Just drop me a note at
User talk:RoySmith. --
RoySmith(talk) 17:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable martial artist lacking non-trivial support.
reddogsix (
talk) 13:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep No need to look for sources or review WP:BEFORE as the article already shows that the topic has been attracting the attention of the world at large for a long time (nutshell WP:N).
Unscintillating (
talk) 15:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Kudos on the hyperbole - but the sources don't demonstrate long-term, international recognition.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 17:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as I was notified about this article as the user asked me to review, my own searches have found only a few links but certainly nothing suggesting the depth needed to improve.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Lim is also an actor, known for Macbeth (2006) as the Chinese Businessman, It's Him... Terry Lim! as himself (2011) and Metal Warrior (2011) as The Secret Weapon.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2397814/ (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Minor roles, such as "Chinese businessman" do not help anyone pass notability.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 17:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
It's him... Terry Lim, is a documentary about him played by himself directed by a notable Australian director this the point of focus in my comment not that minor role u mentioned (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 08:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Comment As it stands the subject does not meet either
WP:NACTOR or
WP:MANOTE. I also don't think he meets
WP:GNG but perhaps there is more out there. I'll hold off voting for a bit - the AfD was started a bit too quick.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 17:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable as an actor or martial artist. Don't know if the online paper the Latin Australian Times is a reliable source or not, but most of the article appears to be about his student. The only way
WP:GNG is met is if the documentary is considered enough to meet it. I don't think so (and even then it's just one source). These days anyone can make a movie and enter a film festival, so it's not the big deal it used to be. I don't think GNG is met.
Mdtemp (
talk) 14:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment Hold off on deleting... as it says in his documentary he has 19 clubs and 3000 members in the martial art he created, population in Melbourne is 3.5 million. More source items will come up soon. (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC))reply
You can ask that the article is userfyed - and work on it there if the decision is to delete.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 12:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Thanks
Peter Rehse What's going on here??? This article was nominated for deletion on the same day it was created... Can you read Spanish
reddogsix?? The Latin Australian Times is a National newspaper in Spanish, I had a lot of help from
Dragonfly6-7 writing this article (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Of course, why would you even ask? BTW - the first two references will have to removed since they refer to items that per Wikipedia violate copyright laws. If you wish to use these articles, you will need to refer to the original location of the article created by the copyright owner.
reddogsix (
talk) 13:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you kindly for the heads up
reddogsix, The references are of a hard copy newspaper not online, forgive my ignorance but how would they be used in this case? (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 11:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC))reply
My pleasure, you would have to remove the reference to the current page and if the pages are not available online you can change the reference to the print version of the article.
reddogsix (
talk) 15:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Based on the references given at the article and my own search, I do not see the significant independent coverage needed to meet
WP:GNG. He does not meet any of the notability criteria for martial artists at
WP:MANOTE. Creating his own martial art is not an indicator of notability.
Papaursa (
talk) 22:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There's clear consensus to delete here. Of the two people arguing to keep, one is the article's creator, and the other provided no policy-based arguments or sources. And, while Peter Rehse didn't provide a bolded, one-word statement, his analysis speaks to deletion.
@
Australianblackbelt:, if you like, I'll be happy to undelete this and move it back into your user space (or, even better, into draft space). Just drop me a note at
User talk:RoySmith. --
RoySmith(talk) 17:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable martial artist lacking non-trivial support.
reddogsix (
talk) 13:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep No need to look for sources or review WP:BEFORE as the article already shows that the topic has been attracting the attention of the world at large for a long time (nutshell WP:N).
Unscintillating (
talk) 15:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Kudos on the hyperbole - but the sources don't demonstrate long-term, international recognition.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 17:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as I was notified about this article as the user asked me to review, my own searches have found only a few links but certainly nothing suggesting the depth needed to improve.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Lim is also an actor, known for Macbeth (2006) as the Chinese Businessman, It's Him... Terry Lim! as himself (2011) and Metal Warrior (2011) as The Secret Weapon.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2397814/ (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Minor roles, such as "Chinese businessman" do not help anyone pass notability.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 17:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
It's him... Terry Lim, is a documentary about him played by himself directed by a notable Australian director this the point of focus in my comment not that minor role u mentioned (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 08:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Comment As it stands the subject does not meet either
WP:NACTOR or
WP:MANOTE. I also don't think he meets
WP:GNG but perhaps there is more out there. I'll hold off voting for a bit - the AfD was started a bit too quick.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 17:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable as an actor or martial artist. Don't know if the online paper the Latin Australian Times is a reliable source or not, but most of the article appears to be about his student. The only way
WP:GNG is met is if the documentary is considered enough to meet it. I don't think so (and even then it's just one source). These days anyone can make a movie and enter a film festival, so it's not the big deal it used to be. I don't think GNG is met.
Mdtemp (
talk) 14:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment Hold off on deleting... as it says in his documentary he has 19 clubs and 3000 members in the martial art he created, population in Melbourne is 3.5 million. More source items will come up soon. (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC))reply
You can ask that the article is userfyed - and work on it there if the decision is to delete.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 12:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Thanks
Peter Rehse What's going on here??? This article was nominated for deletion on the same day it was created... Can you read Spanish
reddogsix?? The Latin Australian Times is a National newspaper in Spanish, I had a lot of help from
Dragonfly6-7 writing this article (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 12:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC))reply
Of course, why would you even ask? BTW - the first two references will have to removed since they refer to items that per Wikipedia violate copyright laws. If you wish to use these articles, you will need to refer to the original location of the article created by the copyright owner.
reddogsix (
talk) 13:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you kindly for the heads up
reddogsix, The references are of a hard copy newspaper not online, forgive my ignorance but how would they be used in this case? (
Australianblackbelt (
talk) 11:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC))reply
My pleasure, you would have to remove the reference to the current page and if the pages are not available online you can change the reference to the print version of the article.
reddogsix (
talk) 15:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Based on the references given at the article and my own search, I do not see the significant independent coverage needed to meet
WP:GNG. He does not meet any of the notability criteria for martial artists at
WP:MANOTE. Creating his own martial art is not an indicator of notability.
Papaursa (
talk) 22:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.