From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Teodors Bļugers (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 07:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep - Meets WP:NHOCKEY 1st criteria unless AHL does not count as top league. patidaba ( talk) 8:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

No the AHL does not count as a top league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Joeykai ( talk) 08:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk 15:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 16:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep He actually does pass WP:NHOCKEY under criterion #4 as he was a First team all-star this year. His WP:GNG argument is weak right now, the two citations currently in the article are very weak, but after a quick search there is probably just enough out there for him to squeak by this time. Deadman137 ( talk) 02:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Teodors Bļugers (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 07:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep - Meets WP:NHOCKEY 1st criteria unless AHL does not count as top league. patidaba ( talk) 8:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

No the AHL does not count as a top league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Joeykai ( talk) 08:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk 15:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 16:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep He actually does pass WP:NHOCKEY under criterion #4 as he was a First team all-star this year. His WP:GNG argument is weak right now, the two citations currently in the article are very weak, but after a quick search there is probably just enough out there for him to squeak by this time. Deadman137 ( talk) 02:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook