The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep He actually does pass
WP:NHOCKEY under criterion #4 as he was a First team all-star this year. His
WP:GNG argument is weak right now, the two citations currently in the article are very weak, but after a quick search there is probably just enough out there for him to squeak by this time.
Deadman137 (
talk)
02:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep He actually does pass
WP:NHOCKEY under criterion #4 as he was a First team all-star this year. His
WP:GNG argument is weak right now, the two citations currently in the article are very weak, but after a quick search there is probably just enough out there for him to squeak by this time.
Deadman137 (
talk)
02:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.