- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This does not preclude someone from rewriting the article if desired. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Teet Kask
- Teet Kask ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's proposed deletion was contested, but it lacks reliable third-party references that would justify its inclusion. {{ Nihiltres| talk| edits}} 23:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Sources are in Estonian, but there's no shortage of coverage e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Hopefully someone with more knowledge of the Estonian language can fix this. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 09:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - the subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples include: [6], [7], [8], [9]. NorthAmerica 1000 09:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice. The subject may or may not be notable, however, neither the current article or sources in there indicate that. As it is atm, the article is a typical COI-edited (editors such as Brorbjork (bjork is birch in Swedish, Kask in Estonian), K.a.s.k.project, Teet Kask) vanity article relying on self-published sources (Youtube channel, Facebook page). I would support keeping the article if it is stubbed or rewritten from scratch using proper sources and neutral point of view. -- Sander Säde 21:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This does not preclude someone from rewriting the article if desired. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Teet Kask
- Teet Kask ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's proposed deletion was contested, but it lacks reliable third-party references that would justify its inclusion. {{ Nihiltres| talk| edits}} 23:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Sources are in Estonian, but there's no shortage of coverage e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Hopefully someone with more knowledge of the Estonian language can fix this. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 09:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - the subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples include: [6], [7], [8], [9]. NorthAmerica 1000 09:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice. The subject may or may not be notable, however, neither the current article or sources in there indicate that. As it is atm, the article is a typical COI-edited (editors such as Brorbjork (bjork is birch in Swedish, Kask in Estonian), K.a.s.k.project, Teet Kask) vanity article relying on self-published sources (Youtube channel, Facebook page). I would support keeping the article if it is stubbed or rewritten from scratch using proper sources and neutral point of view. -- Sander Säde 21:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.