The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Justification: insufficient notability both as a subject and for inclusion in several categories (e.g. space scientists). Most notable achievement is as a young community activist promoting science-related efforts. All other minor recognition, including several sourced articles, are merely reporting on or direct responses to the singular philanthropic achievement. 14.207.5.104 (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copypasted from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --
Finngalltalk04:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep I found Time, NPR, ABCNews, Forbes, Christian Science Monitor. She is an activist who has been raising money since she was 9. A bit special I'd say. scope_creepTalk10:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep The sourcing is there so it should be kept. Subject has received coverage far beyond the local news outlets who typically report on the doings of school-age children. The focus of the article is correctly centered upon the present activist – who is clearly making waves – rather than the future astronaut.
StonyBrook (
talk)
15:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Justification: insufficient notability both as a subject and for inclusion in several categories (e.g. space scientists). Most notable achievement is as a young community activist promoting science-related efforts. All other minor recognition, including several sourced articles, are merely reporting on or direct responses to the singular philanthropic achievement. 14.207.5.104 (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copypasted from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --
Finngalltalk04:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep I found Time, NPR, ABCNews, Forbes, Christian Science Monitor. She is an activist who has been raising money since she was 9. A bit special I'd say. scope_creepTalk10:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep The sourcing is there so it should be kept. Subject has received coverage far beyond the local news outlets who typically report on the doings of school-age children. The focus of the article is correctly centered upon the present activist – who is clearly making waves – rather than the future astronaut.
StonyBrook (
talk)
15:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.