The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I wrote the page because I felt the producers on her new album are all noteworthy (tho that passage was removed) and also had a top 40 single and a million views on video. Believe she is worthy of inclusion, but thank you both for taking time to review.
askkaty2write (
talk) 20:32, 10 November 2020 (EST)
Comment Her Facebook page says the song charted at number 49 on the BillboardAdult Top 40.
WP:MUSICBIO's point 2 requires only that she "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart."
WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS appears to suggest that the Adult Top 40 (Adult Pop Songs) chart applies. But doesn't number 49 mean it didn't register on that chart? -
Lopifalko (
talk)
09:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Is anyone equipped to be able to answer this please? I think the answer is pertinent to whether the subject satisfies the notability criteria. -
Lopifalko (
talk)
12:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I wonder if I can show a PDF? I do have the top 40 chart as a citation but without a sub to billboard you can't see the entire thing. I have a PDF of that page though? -
askkaty2write14:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
This will be left open at least a week from the date of the nomination, so November 17 (UTC time) will be the earliest this gets closed. It could get
relisted, which would extend the time that this discussion stays open (and the deletion tag stays up) by another week. I personally think the article should be kept, but I'm not seeing an overall consensus to do so at the moment, so unless something changes in the discussion, expect a relist.
Hog FarmBacon05:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Given we have a revised chart position of 35, rather than 49, which satisfies
WP:MUSICBIO's point 2. The sources do not satisfy
WP:GNG, but notability has been established by the chart position. (FWIW, the sources we currently have are a)
KTLA on YouTube; b) a primary source from Lynn's own Music As Therapy organisation; c) a primary source from Billboard; at Riff Magazine, a paragraph about the subject where there are paragraphs for each of a number of other musicians, in "Your Weekly New Music Discovery" — I don't know whether Riff Magazine is a reliable source; d) a feature in Phoenix New Times, a publication that only "publishes daily online coverage of local news, restaurants, music and arts, as well as longform narrative journalism".) -
Lopifalko (
talk)
16:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Sorry, I missed the fact that
Hog Farm had unearthed the Idolator piece. Though it's not in-depth coverage, being predominantly an announcement, and a quote. -
Lopifalko (
talk)
16:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I wrote the page because I felt the producers on her new album are all noteworthy (tho that passage was removed) and also had a top 40 single and a million views on video. Believe she is worthy of inclusion, but thank you both for taking time to review.
askkaty2write (
talk) 20:32, 10 November 2020 (EST)
Comment Her Facebook page says the song charted at number 49 on the BillboardAdult Top 40.
WP:MUSICBIO's point 2 requires only that she "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart."
WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS appears to suggest that the Adult Top 40 (Adult Pop Songs) chart applies. But doesn't number 49 mean it didn't register on that chart? -
Lopifalko (
talk)
09:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Is anyone equipped to be able to answer this please? I think the answer is pertinent to whether the subject satisfies the notability criteria. -
Lopifalko (
talk)
12:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I wonder if I can show a PDF? I do have the top 40 chart as a citation but without a sub to billboard you can't see the entire thing. I have a PDF of that page though? -
askkaty2write14:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
This will be left open at least a week from the date of the nomination, so November 17 (UTC time) will be the earliest this gets closed. It could get
relisted, which would extend the time that this discussion stays open (and the deletion tag stays up) by another week. I personally think the article should be kept, but I'm not seeing an overall consensus to do so at the moment, so unless something changes in the discussion, expect a relist.
Hog FarmBacon05:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Given we have a revised chart position of 35, rather than 49, which satisfies
WP:MUSICBIO's point 2. The sources do not satisfy
WP:GNG, but notability has been established by the chart position. (FWIW, the sources we currently have are a)
KTLA on YouTube; b) a primary source from Lynn's own Music As Therapy organisation; c) a primary source from Billboard; at Riff Magazine, a paragraph about the subject where there are paragraphs for each of a number of other musicians, in "Your Weekly New Music Discovery" — I don't know whether Riff Magazine is a reliable source; d) a feature in Phoenix New Times, a publication that only "publishes daily online coverage of local news, restaurants, music and arts, as well as longform narrative journalism".) -
Lopifalko (
talk)
16:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Sorry, I missed the fact that
Hog Farm had unearthed the Idolator piece. Though it's not in-depth coverage, being predominantly an announcement, and a quote. -
Lopifalko (
talk)
16:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.