The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge/redirect to the succession section of her husband
Pulakeshin II. The detail provided suggests that there are sources, but perhaps in Sanskrit, which will not work well with searches in Latin script.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
What makes you so certain that this isn't a hoax, especially given the deletion of all of the previous similar articles like
Devamala (Shunga dynasty) for the same reason? Also, doesn't retaining unverifiable content essentially violate
WP:V and
WP:NOR, which are policies? Please link us to at least one reliable source which proves that this is a legitimate topic.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)18:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge/redirect. Peterkingiron makes a persuasive argument. I feel that a redirect would be much more appropriate than outright deletion in this case.
Historyday01 (
talk)
03:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
His argument would be convincing if there were at least one
WP:RS verifying at least one sentence of this article. Merging this to another article just simply moves the problem. Had someone added this text to another article in the first place, it would have been reverted with the edit summary WP:NOR, please cite a source or similar and no one would bat an eyelid. What sourced content do we lose if we delete this article?
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)07:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge/redirect to the succession section of her husband
Pulakeshin II. The detail provided suggests that there are sources, but perhaps in Sanskrit, which will not work well with searches in Latin script.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
What makes you so certain that this isn't a hoax, especially given the deletion of all of the previous similar articles like
Devamala (Shunga dynasty) for the same reason? Also, doesn't retaining unverifiable content essentially violate
WP:V and
WP:NOR, which are policies? Please link us to at least one reliable source which proves that this is a legitimate topic.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)18:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge/redirect. Peterkingiron makes a persuasive argument. I feel that a redirect would be much more appropriate than outright deletion in this case.
Historyday01 (
talk)
03:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
His argument would be convincing if there were at least one
WP:RS verifying at least one sentence of this article. Merging this to another article just simply moves the problem. Had someone added this text to another article in the first place, it would have been reverted with the edit summary WP:NOR, please cite a source or similar and no one would bat an eyelid. What sourced content do we lose if we delete this article?
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)07:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.