The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This artist is "scheduled to debut her first solo exhibition" but we already have an encyclopedia article about her. That's too soon. Can we give our subjects some time to actually create the body of work that they perhaps, some 25 years from now, are going to be known for?
Vexations (
talk)
14:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:TOOSOON this emerging artist is at the very beginning stages of her career. No indication that her work is included in significant museum collections; nor received in-depth coverage in reviews/articles over an extended period of time in independent reliable sources. She is not yet considered a significant contributor to her field, nor created a well-known work or collective body of work, but perhaps over the next several years her career will develop enough to sustain an article. Does not pass
WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion.
Netherzone (
talk)
22:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete GNG fail. There is a bit of coverage, but the majority of it is published by the organizations she has worked with. Some other sources I saw were interviews. This article is about five or ten years ahead of its time, assuming her career continues on the same upward trajectory. ---
Possibly☎01:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Thank you for your thoughtful feedback, everyone. I am the author of this article and I can see it may be too soon. Perhaps this could be moved to draft space for improvements over the coming months?
LeahLockhart (
talk)
15:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Unsure, does not come close to meeting the
WP:NARTIST criteria, but that is not the whole story. A quick search has revealed useful coverage in reliable sources
The first two are substantial articles in a major newspaper and a significant art magazine. The third is a brief mention in the New York Times, indicating an international profile. Her upcoming solo exhibition at
Dundee Contemporary Arts may attract substantial reviews - perhaps we should keep this open for a few weeks until it has opened.
Verbcatcher (
talk)
18:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This artist is "scheduled to debut her first solo exhibition" but we already have an encyclopedia article about her. That's too soon. Can we give our subjects some time to actually create the body of work that they perhaps, some 25 years from now, are going to be known for?
Vexations (
talk)
14:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:TOOSOON this emerging artist is at the very beginning stages of her career. No indication that her work is included in significant museum collections; nor received in-depth coverage in reviews/articles over an extended period of time in independent reliable sources. She is not yet considered a significant contributor to her field, nor created a well-known work or collective body of work, but perhaps over the next several years her career will develop enough to sustain an article. Does not pass
WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion.
Netherzone (
talk)
22:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete GNG fail. There is a bit of coverage, but the majority of it is published by the organizations she has worked with. Some other sources I saw were interviews. This article is about five or ten years ahead of its time, assuming her career continues on the same upward trajectory. ---
Possibly☎01:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Thank you for your thoughtful feedback, everyone. I am the author of this article and I can see it may be too soon. Perhaps this could be moved to draft space for improvements over the coming months?
LeahLockhart (
talk)
15:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Unsure, does not come close to meeting the
WP:NARTIST criteria, but that is not the whole story. A quick search has revealed useful coverage in reliable sources
The first two are substantial articles in a major newspaper and a significant art magazine. The third is a brief mention in the New York Times, indicating an international profile. Her upcoming solo exhibition at
Dundee Contemporary Arts may attract substantial reviews - perhaps we should keep this open for a few weeks until it has opened.
Verbcatcher (
talk)
18:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.