The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article created by blocked sock-master, article is questionable and highly POV, and it should be deleted
Axiomus (
talk) 12:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - An article created by a Sockmaster is not a valid reason for deletion. Claiming an article is POV is also not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be a case of
WP:IDL. This is a valid notable article which is referenced appropriately.
IJA (
talk) 15:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - as per rationale given by IJA. There is a huge number of articles currently proposed for deletion just because of the
WP:IDL or renamed without consensus by the nominator, all simultaneously.--
Mondiad (
talk) 18:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Found 5 Gbooks mentioning him.--
Zoupan 19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - Yeah it's pretty stupid to nominate every single article created by AH..., Anyway I'm not seeing any beneficial advantages to deleting the article .... Plus it meets GNG anyway.... –
Davey2010Talk 20:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep -- far from an ideal article, but not so bad as to need TNT.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article created by blocked sock-master, article is questionable and highly POV, and it should be deleted
Axiomus (
talk) 12:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - An article created by a Sockmaster is not a valid reason for deletion. Claiming an article is POV is also not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be a case of
WP:IDL. This is a valid notable article which is referenced appropriately.
IJA (
talk) 15:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - as per rationale given by IJA. There is a huge number of articles currently proposed for deletion just because of the
WP:IDL or renamed without consensus by the nominator, all simultaneously.--
Mondiad (
talk) 18:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Found 5 Gbooks mentioning him.--
Zoupan 19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - Yeah it's pretty stupid to nominate every single article created by AH..., Anyway I'm not seeing any beneficial advantages to deleting the article .... Plus it meets GNG anyway.... –
Davey2010Talk 20:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep -- far from an ideal article, but not so bad as to need TNT.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.