The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is generally true for example first person to teach in Germany, Easter US, etc. What we are talking about is the first person to be officially sent to bring Aikido to the west. That is a huge thing in the expansion of aikido outside of Japan and why I think the person who did that is notable. It turns out that 8 years ago the first edit was by myself but I think I was helping someone else move it into article space which is ironic considering that if I was really paranoid, the nomination may be a revenge AfD. I was glad that the references have been improved since the AfD nomination.
Peter Rehse (
talk)
11:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I'm glad you brought this into better view. I choose sometimes random article deletion topics to get a broad scope on subjects, but sometimes I make mistakes. I will change my vote to keep per your argument .
TheGracefulSlick (
talk)
17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I question the removal of several of those sources. AikiNews/AikiJournal are pretty reliable 3rd party sources. These were published in print form for years and have a very good reputation for accuracy.
Peter Rehse (
talk)
22:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Did you not notice that I restored them. I disagree, but it's not worth fighting. Even with them, I don't see the coverage needed.
Niteshift36 (
talk)
01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Per sources found and Innotata, also the fact that this is a pre-internet, mostly foreign language person, the sources found in English are enough.
GuzzyG (
talk)
03:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is generally true for example first person to teach in Germany, Easter US, etc. What we are talking about is the first person to be officially sent to bring Aikido to the west. That is a huge thing in the expansion of aikido outside of Japan and why I think the person who did that is notable. It turns out that 8 years ago the first edit was by myself but I think I was helping someone else move it into article space which is ironic considering that if I was really paranoid, the nomination may be a revenge AfD. I was glad that the references have been improved since the AfD nomination.
Peter Rehse (
talk)
11:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I'm glad you brought this into better view. I choose sometimes random article deletion topics to get a broad scope on subjects, but sometimes I make mistakes. I will change my vote to keep per your argument .
TheGracefulSlick (
talk)
17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I question the removal of several of those sources. AikiNews/AikiJournal are pretty reliable 3rd party sources. These were published in print form for years and have a very good reputation for accuracy.
Peter Rehse (
talk)
22:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Did you not notice that I restored them. I disagree, but it's not worth fighting. Even with them, I don't see the coverage needed.
Niteshift36 (
talk)
01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Per sources found and Innotata, also the fact that this is a pre-internet, mostly foreign language person, the sources found in English are enough.
GuzzyG (
talk)
03:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.