From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that there is just enough sources to meet the notability criteria. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 11:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Tadashi Abe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 09:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable. TheGreenGiant23 ( talk) 16:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ( tJosve05a ( c) 17:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Speedy Keep Pioneer of Aikido to the west. This is documented. CrazyAces489 ( talk) 22:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete - Being the first in something doesn't necessarily mean your notable, especially if it's just in a different location. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 02:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Changing vote. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
forward to aikido although aikido is an ineffective martial art with a strange cult like following. This guy should be on its page. 172.56.34.233 ( talk) 15:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC) reply
This is generally true for example first person to teach in Germany, Easter US, etc. What we are talking about is the first person to be officially sent to bring Aikido to the west. That is a huge thing in the expansion of aikido outside of Japan and why I think the person who did that is notable. It turns out that 8 years ago the first edit was by myself but I think I was helping someone else move it into article space which is ironic considering that if I was really paranoid, the nomination may be a revenge AfD. I was glad that the references have been improved since the AfD nomination. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I'm glad you brought this into better view. I choose sometimes random article deletion topics to get a broad scope on subjects, but sometimes I make mistakes. I will change my vote to keep per your argument . TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I question the removal of several of those sources. AikiNews/AikiJournal are pretty reliable 3rd party sources. These were published in print form for years and have a very good reputation for accuracy. Peter Rehse ( talk) 22:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Well they weren't but I did. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:47, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  07:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that there is just enough sources to meet the notability criteria. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 11:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Tadashi Abe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 09:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable. TheGreenGiant23 ( talk) 16:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ( tJosve05a ( c) 17:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Speedy Keep Pioneer of Aikido to the west. This is documented. CrazyAces489 ( talk) 22:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete - Being the first in something doesn't necessarily mean your notable, especially if it's just in a different location. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 02:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Changing vote. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
forward to aikido although aikido is an ineffective martial art with a strange cult like following. This guy should be on its page. 172.56.34.233 ( talk) 15:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC) reply
This is generally true for example first person to teach in Germany, Easter US, etc. What we are talking about is the first person to be officially sent to bring Aikido to the west. That is a huge thing in the expansion of aikido outside of Japan and why I think the person who did that is notable. It turns out that 8 years ago the first edit was by myself but I think I was helping someone else move it into article space which is ironic considering that if I was really paranoid, the nomination may be a revenge AfD. I was glad that the references have been improved since the AfD nomination. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I'm glad you brought this into better view. I choose sometimes random article deletion topics to get a broad scope on subjects, but sometimes I make mistakes. I will change my vote to keep per your argument . TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I question the removal of several of those sources. AikiNews/AikiJournal are pretty reliable 3rd party sources. These were published in print form for years and have a very good reputation for accuracy. Peter Rehse ( talk) 22:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Well they weren't but I did. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:47, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  07:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook