The result was Delete as not appropriate for a stand-alone article. -- Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Woefully incomplete and totally out of date. While those two reasons by themselves are not sufficient for deletion, they are when combined with the fact that this article at best would be the start to an almanac-type Wikibook on lunar calendar correspondences, assuming anyone was interested in writing one, which judging by the lack of effort on this article, no one is. Carolina wren ( talk) 06:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as not appropriate for a stand-alone article. -- Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Woefully incomplete and totally out of date. While those two reasons by themselves are not sufficient for deletion, they are when combined with the fact that this article at best would be the start to an almanac-type Wikibook on lunar calendar correspondences, assuming anyone was interested in writing one, which judging by the lack of effort on this article, no one is. Carolina wren ( talk) 06:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply