The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 15:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC) reply

TOKU-E (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this company seems like it would be notable per Wikipedia's standards, source searches are not demonstrating that WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH are met. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete The article reads too much like a press release.-- Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 02:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.