- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 14:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sunset Limousine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I guess this film does not comply with our movie notability guidelines. What do you think colleagues? Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 21:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- keep. The article, although currently short, satisfies notability by having notable people involved (the writers, Clement and La Frenais). Independent coverage via the British Film Institute (external link). The JPS (typing on mobile, without access to regular symbols). 21:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Not one of the best known TV movies of all time, but there's sufficient coverage to pass GNG: People [1]; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [2]; Sarasota Herald-Tribune and affiliates [3] [4] [5]; The Age [6]. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep And to answer your question, nominator... With due respects, I think you guessed wrong. Please re-read WP:NF and WP:GNG, and more specially WP:BEFORE and WP:NTEMP. This film may be 80s crappola, but it meets notability guidelines none-the-less. And there's WP:SEP and WP:IMPROVE. We expand stubs on notable topics... NOT delete them because it has not been done. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, if you all think differently than me, I think the best thing will be to withdraw the nomination. Let us not lose more time here. (Those of you who wish may visit the last AfD discussion I opened to see if I nailed it this time. :-) Thanks and regards to all. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 18:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- To the nominator: Thank you for your withdrawal. Inspired by the WP:BEFORE of others above, I performed some work on the Sunset Limousine article, taking the 230 characters (39 words) stub that was nominated and easily expanding it to a 2534 characters (413 words) C-class article... a 10x expansion. Care to help devise a decent DYK? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 14:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sunset Limousine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I guess this film does not comply with our movie notability guidelines. What do you think colleagues? Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 21:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- keep. The article, although currently short, satisfies notability by having notable people involved (the writers, Clement and La Frenais). Independent coverage via the British Film Institute (external link). The JPS (typing on mobile, without access to regular symbols). 21:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Not one of the best known TV movies of all time, but there's sufficient coverage to pass GNG: People [1]; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [2]; Sarasota Herald-Tribune and affiliates [3] [4] [5]; The Age [6]. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep And to answer your question, nominator... With due respects, I think you guessed wrong. Please re-read WP:NF and WP:GNG, and more specially WP:BEFORE and WP:NTEMP. This film may be 80s crappola, but it meets notability guidelines none-the-less. And there's WP:SEP and WP:IMPROVE. We expand stubs on notable topics... NOT delete them because it has not been done. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, if you all think differently than me, I think the best thing will be to withdraw the nomination. Let us not lose more time here. (Those of you who wish may visit the last AfD discussion I opened to see if I nailed it this time. :-) Thanks and regards to all. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 18:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- To the nominator: Thank you for your withdrawal. Inspired by the WP:BEFORE of others above, I performed some work on the Sunset Limousine article, taking the 230 characters (39 words) stub that was nominated and easily expanding it to a 2534 characters (413 words) C-class article... a 10x expansion. Care to help devise a decent DYK? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.