The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
WP:NCORP. The Per
WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability
. I am generally unable to find coverage of this company outside of local media; the sources in this article include small local newspaper
Redding Record Searchlight and local television station
KRCR-TV, and I'm not able to find coverage of this business outside of exclusively local stations and a trivial mention in a single trade journals (and, per
WP:ORGIND there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability
). Because this fails
WP:NCORP, and
WP:ORGCRIT notes that NCORP establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability
than we may see in other contexts, this should be deleted for failing to meet the relevant notability criteria in line with
WP:DEL-REASON#8. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
01:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
USA Today (redding.com) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
USA Today (redding.com) | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Video is a very brief interview with the owner but does not go in depth, honestly this is a bit of a gray area for me | ~ Partial |
ABC Affiliate (KRCR) | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Video is about one minute long and talks about the opening of the store, does not go in depth but has interviews with the general manager | ~ Partial |
ABC Affiliate (KRCR) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 03:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
NCORP table | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On top of the above, even if these sources were enough to contribute towards notability, we're still dealing with a substantial WP:AUD problem inasmuch as these are both subregional (i.e. local) publications. I truly can't find any coverage of this entity even in broader regional media, which is the death knell for the article subject's notability in my view. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
WP:NCORP. The Per
WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability
. I am generally unable to find coverage of this company outside of local media; the sources in this article include small local newspaper
Redding Record Searchlight and local television station
KRCR-TV, and I'm not able to find coverage of this business outside of exclusively local stations and a trivial mention in a single trade journals (and, per
WP:ORGIND there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability
). Because this fails
WP:NCORP, and
WP:ORGCRIT notes that NCORP establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability
than we may see in other contexts, this should be deleted for failing to meet the relevant notability criteria in line with
WP:DEL-REASON#8. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
01:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
USA Today (redding.com) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
USA Today (redding.com) | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Video is a very brief interview with the owner but does not go in depth, honestly this is a bit of a gray area for me | ~ Partial |
ABC Affiliate (KRCR) | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Video is about one minute long and talks about the opening of the store, does not go in depth but has interviews with the general manager | ~ Partial |
ABC Affiliate (KRCR) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 03:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
NCORP table | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On top of the above, even if these sources were enough to contribute towards notability, we're still dealing with a substantial WP:AUD problem inasmuch as these are both subregional (i.e. local) publications. I truly can't find any coverage of this entity even in broader regional media, which is the death knell for the article subject's notability in my view. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)