From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Summit Power

Summit Power (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company, not properly sourced as passing WP:CORP criteria. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on their coverage in reliable sources such as news media and books -- but this is referenced entirely to directly affiliated primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no reliable or GNG-building sources shown at all.
It also warrants note that this was recently hijacked to be about a completely different company with the same name, which was also referenced entirely to its own self-published website with no evidence of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing, and thus wasn't properly established as notable either. Bearcat ( talk) 13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Summit Power

Summit Power (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company, not properly sourced as passing WP:CORP criteria. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on their coverage in reliable sources such as news media and books -- but this is referenced entirely to directly affiliated primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no reliable or GNG-building sources shown at all.
It also warrants note that this was recently hijacked to be about a completely different company with the same name, which was also referenced entirely to its own self-published website with no evidence of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing, and thus wasn't properly established as notable either. Bearcat ( talk) 13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook