The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a company, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:CORP criteria. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH on their coverage in
reliable sources such as news media and books -- but this is referenced entirely to directly affiliated
primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no reliable or GNG-building sources shown at all.
It also warrants note that this was recently hijacked to be about a completely different company with the same name, which was also referenced entirely to its own self-published website with no evidence of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing, and thus wasn't properly established as notable either.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a company, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:CORP criteria. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH on their coverage in
reliable sources such as news media and books -- but this is referenced entirely to directly affiliated
primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no reliable or GNG-building sources shown at all.
It also warrants note that this was recently hijacked to be about a completely different company with the same name, which was also referenced entirely to its own self-published website with no evidence of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing, and thus wasn't properly established as notable either.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)