The result was No consensus. This debate has turned in to the classic argument of whether something in the news and seemingly quite important now will continue to be noteworthy in the future. From a strict policy reading this article should be deleted, but consensus doesn't exist for that. Since no one here is psychic, reevaluate it in a month or so. Prodego talk 18:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested PROD, the article fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:BIO1E there is no indication that this tragic event goes beyond a local event. The article is nothing more than a rehash of news reports without any encyclopedic analysis. Mt king (edits) 23:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply
STRONG KEEP. I am actually disturbed that some people want to delete this, especially since afaik the cyberbully has not been found yet. D is for... ( talk) 02:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
I didn't number this break because hopefully there isn't a need. Though I called to delete, as this sort of article is a product of the lowest common denominator of drive-by media swill, it doesn't have a prayer of actually being deleted given the piling on above. Can we just call this one early and move on? Tarc ( talk) 23:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep Amanda Todd was a good person who had a hard life. Maybe the article should be on her whole life, though, not just focusing on her recent death. -Wahula- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahula ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. This debate has turned in to the classic argument of whether something in the news and seemingly quite important now will continue to be noteworthy in the future. From a strict policy reading this article should be deleted, but consensus doesn't exist for that. Since no one here is psychic, reevaluate it in a month or so. Prodego talk 18:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested PROD, the article fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:BIO1E there is no indication that this tragic event goes beyond a local event. The article is nothing more than a rehash of news reports without any encyclopedic analysis. Mt king (edits) 23:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply
STRONG KEEP. I am actually disturbed that some people want to delete this, especially since afaik the cyberbully has not been found yet. D is for... ( talk) 02:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
I didn't number this break because hopefully there isn't a need. Though I called to delete, as this sort of article is a product of the lowest common denominator of drive-by media swill, it doesn't have a prayer of actually being deleted given the piling on above. Can we just call this one early and move on? Tarc ( talk) 23:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep Amanda Todd was a good person who had a hard life. Maybe the article should be on her whole life, though, not just focusing on her recent death. -Wahula- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahula ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply