- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Scott ( talk) 21:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sue Helton Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. I haven't nominated places in a very long time because it seems that if a place exists, no matter how inconsequential, editors vote to keep it. But I'm breaking my rule. I fail to see how a 1/4 acre park in a medium-sized town with nothing remarkable about it is notable. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There's nothing on this park except a primary source, a directory listing, and a blog post. I agree geography articles tend to get kept more often than not since the notability standards are lower, but that doesn't mean they all deserve to be kept, as this fails WP:GEOFEAT. SportingFlyer talk 23:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, a park the size of a house block that isnt even listed in its town article, with no sources available should not have a wikiarticle, a quick gsearch, as well as not bringing up any useable sources, did not reveal who the park was named after but instead revealed a bit of confusion about the name, is it Sue Helton ( see here) or Charlotte Sue Helton ( see here)? Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete has one source, but no evidence of notability or significant independent coverage -- DannyS712 ( talk) 23:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Scott ( talk) 21:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sue Helton Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. I haven't nominated places in a very long time because it seems that if a place exists, no matter how inconsequential, editors vote to keep it. But I'm breaking my rule. I fail to see how a 1/4 acre park in a medium-sized town with nothing remarkable about it is notable. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There's nothing on this park except a primary source, a directory listing, and a blog post. I agree geography articles tend to get kept more often than not since the notability standards are lower, but that doesn't mean they all deserve to be kept, as this fails WP:GEOFEAT. SportingFlyer talk 23:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, a park the size of a house block that isnt even listed in its town article, with no sources available should not have a wikiarticle, a quick gsearch, as well as not bringing up any useable sources, did not reveal who the park was named after but instead revealed a bit of confusion about the name, is it Sue Helton ( see here) or Charlotte Sue Helton ( see here)? Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete has one source, but no evidence of notability or significant independent coverage -- DannyS712 ( talk) 23:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.