- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 18:46, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Style & Society (magazine)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Style & Society (magazine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
UPE Promotion for non notable magazine. None of the awards for the founder are major. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the mag. A lot of PR and primary. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Delete I have grave concerns given this page was created by Amandadoyle543 - same editor who was center of COI discussion /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_142#Amandadoyle543 - a discussion whereby nothing seems to have come of it. Someone should look further into the editor! MaskedSinger ( talk) 18:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 18:46, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Style & Society (magazine)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Style & Society (magazine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
UPE Promotion for non notable magazine. None of the awards for the founder are major. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the mag. A lot of PR and primary. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Delete I have grave concerns given this page was created by Amandadoyle543 - same editor who was center of COI discussion /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_142#Amandadoyle543 - a discussion whereby nothing seems to have come of it. Someone should look further into the editor! MaskedSinger ( talk) 18:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.