From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Stephanie Studebaker

Stephanie Studebaker (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footnote in United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2006#District 3 is sufficient Jb45424 ( talk) 03:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Obviously lacking any long-term notability. Fails WP:NPOL AusLondonder ( talk) 06:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • A candidate for office does not get an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for being a candidate — and that's especially true for a candidate who withdraws their candidacy in advance of the election. If you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she was already notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to get an article because of the candidacy itself. However, nothing here satisfies that condition at all. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 18:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete non-notable failed candidate for public office. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Stephanie Studebaker

Stephanie Studebaker (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footnote in United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2006#District 3 is sufficient Jb45424 ( talk) 03:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Obviously lacking any long-term notability. Fails WP:NPOL AusLondonder ( talk) 06:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • A candidate for office does not get an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for being a candidate — and that's especially true for a candidate who withdraws their candidacy in advance of the election. If you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she was already notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to get an article because of the candidacy itself. However, nothing here satisfies that condition at all. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 18:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete non-notable failed candidate for public office. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook