The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Obviously lacking any long-term notability. Fails
WP:NPOLAusLondonder (
talk) 06:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
A candidate for office does not get an automatic
WP:NPOL pass just for being a candidate — and that's especially true for a candidate who withdraws their candidacy in advance of the election. If you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she was already notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to get an article because of the candidacy itself. However, nothing here satisfies that condition at all. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable failed candidate for public office.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Obviously lacking any long-term notability. Fails
WP:NPOLAusLondonder (
talk) 06:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
A candidate for office does not get an automatic
WP:NPOL pass just for being a candidate — and that's especially true for a candidate who withdraws their candidacy in advance of the election. If you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she was already notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to get an article because of the candidacy itself. However, nothing here satisfies that condition at all. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable failed candidate for public office.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.