The result was speedy keep. Without prejudice as to the issue of good/bad-faith, the nomination presents no valid reason for deletion. Owen× ☎ 21:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I think a Deletion is in order, as Wikipedia should give fair and unbaised facts. The page only gives views that could be deemed as Baised Peterpanpirate ( talk) 07:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I think a Deletion is in order, as Wikipedia should give fair and unbaised facts. The page only gives views that could be deemed as Baised Peterpanpirate ( talk) 07:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Without prejudice as to the issue of good/bad-faith, the nomination presents no valid reason for deletion. Owen× ☎ 21:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I think a Deletion is in order, as Wikipedia should give fair and unbaised facts. The page only gives views that could be deemed as Baised Peterpanpirate ( talk) 07:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I think a Deletion is in order, as Wikipedia should give fair and unbaised facts. The page only gives views that could be deemed as Baised Peterpanpirate ( talk) 07:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC) reply